{"id":2443442,"date":"2019-04-25T20:40:00","date_gmt":"2019-04-26T02:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/news\/aspen-responds-to-judges-request-in-castle-maroon-dam-cases\/"},"modified":"2019-04-25T20:40:00","modified_gmt":"2019-04-26T02:40:00","slug":"aspen-responds-to-judges-request-in-castle-maroon-dam-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/local-news\/aspen-responds-to-judges-request-in-castle-maroon-dam-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Aspen responds to judge\u2019s request in Castle\/Maroon dam cases"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"620\" height=\"349\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/citywater-atd-042619-1.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-post-image\" alt srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/citywater-atd-042619-1.jpg 620w, https:\/\/cdn.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/04\/citywater-atd-042619-1-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 620px) 100vw, 620px\"><figcaption><strong>A look into the deep hole in Woody Creek at the gravel pit operated by Elam Construction. The City of Aspen has included this location on its list of potential locations it might move the water rights from the Castle and Maroon creek reservoirs to, along with an undisturbed parcel next door to the gravel pit.<\/strong><br \/><em>Brent Gardner-Smith \/ Aspen Journalism<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText DropCap\">The question of whether the City of Aspen has valid conditional water-storage rights tied to the potential Castle and Maroon creek reservoirs \u2014 rights the city now wishes to move to other locations \u2014 remains unresolved before state water court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The latest activity in the two water-court cases about the Castle and Maroon water rights took place April 19, when water attorneys for the city responded to a judge\u2019s request to provide more information about two key legal questions: whether the city has been diligent in its efforts to develop the reservoirs and whether it has a legitimate need for the amount of water it is claiming.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">It\u2019s not yet clear whether the information the city submitted to the court April 19 will be enough to satisfy Judge James Boyd, who is overseeing both cases \u2014 one involving the Castle Creek Reservoir water right and the other involving the Maroon Creek Reservoir water right \u2014 in Division 5 water court in Glenwood Springs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">A case-management conference call in the case was slated for Thursday morning \u2014 and that may have provided some insight into how the judge viewed the city\u2019s latest information \u2014 but another ongoing trial required the judge to reschedule the conference call about the Castle and Maroon water rights for May 8.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">Boyd in November told the city\u2019s water attorney, Cynthia Covell of Alperstein and Covell, that he needed more information on both diligence and need.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">\u201cI don\u2019t know if I have any information, really, in the record for me to make the finding that as part of a diligence decree, or diligence burden of proof, of a substantial probability that the project will ultimately reach fruition, so it seems to me I may need some additional actual record to support that conclusion,\u201d Boyd said in November.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">Regarding the city\u2019s stated need for up to 13,000 acre-feet of water between the two potential reservoirs, he also said, \u201cThere is nothing in the record to really explain why that\u2019s an appropriate number for the court to approve, and I think I may need some record to support that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The city is seeking a ruling from the judge that it has been diligent in developing the two potential reservoirs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The city has told the court that, after obtaining a positive diligence finding, it intends to try to transfer the location of the conditional water-storage rights, which carry a 1971 adjudication date and 1965 appropriation date, from the original locations in upper Castle and Maroon creeks to locations closer to the Roaring Fork River. The locations include the city\u2019s golf course, the Maroon Creek Club golf course, the Cozy Point open space, the Woody Creek gravel pit operated by Elam Construction and an empty parcel of land next to the gravel pit now owned by the city.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">In the information submitted to the court April 19, Covell made the city\u2019s case in succinct fashion, submitting a six-page, revised proposed decree and a four-page supplement to an earlier motion to approve the proposed decree.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The city has previously told the court that it has been diligent in its efforts to develop the reservoirs and that it does, in fact, need the water to meet future demands, especially given climate change.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">And it said so again April 19 \u2014 but without adding much, if any, new information to the existing court record.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">\u201cAspen needs the Maroon Creek Reservoir water right,\u201d the city said in the April 19 filing. The city also told the court that it \u201chas exercised reasonable diligence in the development of the Maroon Creek Reservoir water right.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">It made similar statements regarding the water right tied to a potential Castle Creek Reservoir.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">Under Colorado water law, decisions about whether an applicant has been reasonably diligent in pursuing the development of a given water project are made by a judge on a case-by-case basis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The court cases began when the city filed a diligence application with the water court in October 2016 seeking to maintain its conditional water-storage rights for both reservoirs, which the city first filed for in 1965.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">Ten parties \u2014 Pitkin County, the U.S. Forest Service, American Rivers, Wilderness Workshop, Colorado Trout Unlimited, Western Resource Advocates and four private property owners \u2014 filed statements of opposition in response to the city\u2019s 2016 diligence applications.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">Two years later, in October 2018, the city announced it had reached agreements with all of the opposing parties in the two cases and submitted those agreements to the court, along with a request that the court issue a new decree finding that the city has been diligent and that the conditional water-storage rights are valid for at least another six years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The new decree also incorporates the terms of the agreements reached with the opposing parties.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The agreements say the city will not build the Maroon and Castle creek reservoirs in their decreed locations and, instead, will seek to move the location of the conditional water storage rights out of the two pristine valleys.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The city also is now limited to storing no more than 8,500 acre-feet of water in the new locations, instead of potentially storing more than 13,000 acre-feet under the original decrees. The water for the 8,500 acre-feet of storage could come from both Castle and Maroon creeks under the agreements.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">Today, the city\u2019s water supply comes primarily from Castle Creek, but the supply is supplemented with water from Maroon Creek. The city has senior water rights for those diversions that are not tied to the conditional water storage rights.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">The opposing parties also agreed not to challenge the city\u2019s anticipated request to change the location of the conditional storage rights, but other outside parties may still do so.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">But, in the latest information submitted by the city, there is a sentence in each case that seems to contradict the city\u2019s agreed-upon position that it no longer intends to build either the Castle or Maroon creek reservoirs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">A sentence in the supplement to an earlier motion in the Maroon Creek case says, \u201cAspen intends to construct the Maroon Creek Reservoir to provide a legal, reliable water supply to its customers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">In the Castle Creek case, a similar sentence says, \u201cAspen intends to construct the Castle Creek Reservoir \u2026 .\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText\">Asked about the sentence in the Maroon Creek Reservoir case, which seems at face value to indicate that Aspen still intends to build a big dam within view of the iconic Maroon Bells, Covell said, \u201cThey intend to construct the reservoir. They intend to construct it at a different location.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"STND-STND BodyText Tagline\">Aspen Journalism covers rivers and water in collaboration with The Aspen Times and other Swift Communication newspapers. More at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aspenjournalism.org\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.aspenjournalism.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/news\/aspen-responds-to-judges-request-in-castle-maroon-dam-cases\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">via:: The Aspen Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A look into the deep hole in Woody Creek at the gravel pit operated by Elam Construction. The City of Aspen has included this location on its list of potential locations it might move the water rights from the Castle and Maroon creek reservoirs to, along with an undisturbed parcel next door to the gravel [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2443442","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-local-news"},"acf":[],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-06-17 08:35:17","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"KSPN The Valley&#039;s Quality Rock","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2443442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2443442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2443442\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2443442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2443442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2443442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}