{"id":2448600,"date":"2019-09-12T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-09-12T14:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/?p=312705"},"modified":"2019-09-12T08:00:00","modified_gmt":"2019-09-12T14:00:00","slug":"could-holy-cross-energy-go-100-renewable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/local-news\/could-holy-cross-energy-go-100-renewable\/","title":{"rendered":"Could Holy Cross Energy go 100% renewable?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"swift-gallery p402_hide\" readability=\"6.6767317939609\">\n<ul id=\"imageGallery-312705-300\" class=\"gallery list-unstyled\">\n<li data-thumb=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-150x150.jpg\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2.jpg\" data-sub-html=\"Allen Best | Xcel Energy's Rush Creek wind farm.\" class=\"h-100\" readability=\"-2\">\n<div class=\"caption\" readability=\"7\">\n<p><strong>Xcel Energy&#8217;s Rush Creek wind farm.<\/strong><br \/>Allen Best<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row no-gutters h-100\">\n<div class=\"col my-auto\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2.jpg\" alt=\"Xcel Energy's Rush Creek wind farm.\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li data-thumb=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-1-150x150.jpg\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-1.jpg\" data-sub-html=\"Allen Best | Xcel Energy's Rush Creek wind farm.\" class=\"h-100\" readability=\"-2\">\n<div class=\"caption\" readability=\"7\">\n<p><strong>Xcel Energy&#8217;s Rush Creek wind farm.<\/strong><br \/>Allen Best<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row no-gutters h-100\">\n<div class=\"col my-auto\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"Xcel Energy's Rush Creek wind farm.\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li data-thumb=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-2-150x150.jpg\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-2.jpg\" data-sub-html=\"Allen Best | Xcel Energy's Rush Creek wind farm.\" class=\"h-100\" readability=\"-2\">\n<div class=\"caption\" readability=\"7\">\n<p><strong>Xcel Energy&#8217;s Rush Creek wind farm.<\/strong><br \/>Allen Best<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row no-gutters h-100\">\n<div class=\"col my-auto\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-2.jpg\" alt=\"Xcel Energy's Rush Creek wind farm.\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li data-thumb=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-3-150x150.jpg\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-3.jpg\" data-sub-html=\"Allen Best | Xcel Energy's Rush Creek wind farm.\" class=\"h-100\" readability=\"-2\">\n<div class=\"caption\" readability=\"7\">\n<p><strong>Xcel Energy&#8217;s Rush Creek wind farm.<\/strong><br \/>Allen Best<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row no-gutters h-100\">\n<div class=\"col my-auto\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-3.jpg\" alt=\"Xcel Energy's Rush Creek wind farm.\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li data-thumb=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-4-150x150.jpg\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-4.jpg\" data-sub-html=\"Courtesy photo | Colorado Green, the state's first major wind farm, located south of Lamar in southeastern Colorado.\" class=\"h-100\" readability=\"-0.5\">\n<div class=\"caption\" readability=\"10\">\n<p><strong>Colorado Green, the state&#8217;s first major wind farm, located south of Lamar in southeastern Colorado.<\/strong><br \/>Courtesy photo<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row no-gutters h-100\">\n<div class=\"col my-auto\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-4.jpg\" alt=\"Colorado Green, the state's first major wind farm, located south of Lamar in southeastern Colorado.\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li data-thumb=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-5-150x150.jpg\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-5.jpg\" data-sub-html=\"Courtesy photo | Colorado Green, the state's first major wind farm, located south of Lamar in southeastern Colorado.\" class=\"h-100\" readability=\"-0.5\">\n<div class=\"caption\" readability=\"10\">\n<p><strong>Colorado Green, the state&#8217;s first major wind farm, located south of Lamar in southeastern Colorado.<\/strong><br \/>Courtesy photo<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row no-gutters h-100\">\n<div class=\"col my-auto\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-5.jpg\" alt=\"Colorado Green, the state's first major wind farm, located south of Lamar in southeastern Colorado.\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li data-thumb=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-6-150x150.jpg\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-6.jpg\" data-sub-html=\"Courtesy photo | The Comanche 3 power plant in Pueblo.\" class=\"h-100\" readability=\"-2\">\n<div class=\"caption\" readability=\"7\">\n<p><strong>The Comanche 3 power plant in Pueblo.<\/strong><br \/>Courtesy photo<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row no-gutters h-100\">\n<div class=\"col my-auto\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-6.jpg\" alt=\"The Comanche 3 power plant in Pueblo.\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li data-thumb=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-7-150x150.jpg\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-7.jpg\" data-sub-html=\"Courtesy photo | Holy Cross Energy president and CEO Bryan Hannegan\" class=\"h-100\" readability=\"-2\">\n<div class=\"caption\" readability=\"7\">\n<p><strong>Holy Cross Energy president and CEO Bryan Hannegan<\/strong><br \/>Courtesy photo<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row no-gutters h-100\">\n<div class=\"col my-auto\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2019\/09\/cover-atw-091219-2-7.jpg\" alt=\"Holy Cross Energy president and CEO Bryan Hannegan\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"caption-toggle\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/news\/could-holy-cross-energy-go-100-renewable\/#\" class=\"show-captions\">Show Captions<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/news\/could-holy-cross-energy-go-100-renewable\/#\" class=\"hide-captions\">Hide Captions<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Holy Cross Energy, the electrical utility that serves parts of Aspen and the rest of the Roaring Fork Valley, announced goals in September 2018 that at once looked cautious and ambitious. Directors said they aimed to achieve 70% carbon-free electricity by 2030. They were \u2014 and still are \u2014 at about 39% clean energy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">But Holy Cross in late August announced affirmatively that its 2030 goal would be met for sure by 2021 and possibly even by 2020. It will take this giant leap with completion of a new wind farm about 120 miles southeast of Denver.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Customers of Aspen Electric, the city utility, can be excused for yawning. After all, the city was able to hit 100% renewable energy in 2015, one of the first few utilities in the nation able to make that claim. It did so by bulking up on wind power from the Great Plains, specifically the panhandle of Nebraska, but also hydroelectric power from the big dams of the West, a bit of local and regional hydroelectric, plus a tiny amount of landfill gas. The gas is burned to generate electricity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Ah, but it\u2019s Aspen, some have scoffed. People there can afford to pay high rates for renewables, they say dismissively. What that misses are the semi-annual surveys by the Colorado Association of Municipal Utilities that finds Aspen Electric\u2019s rates consistently among the lowest in the state.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-pullquote p402_hide\" readability=\"2\">\n<blockquote readability=\"7\">\n<p>I think you will see us come up with a plan to get to 80% fairly soon. We know we will get there. We just don\u2019t know exactly how we will get there.-Jenna Weatherred, Holy Cross Energy<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">The city utility meets about one-third of the demand within the city\u2019s emissions inventory boundary, according to the <a id=\"N0x13550c0N0x14993f0:N0x13550c0N0x12cd8c0\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cityofaspen.com\/DocumentCenter\/View\/4506\/Aspens-Climate-Action-Plan-\">city\u2019s climate action plan<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">If Aspen Electric can hit 100%, why is it such a big deal that Holy Cross Energy now is on the verge of getting to 70%?<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Holy Cross Energy is larger and, until last December, it was tethered to a coal plant, Comanche 3 in Pueblo. It\u2019s one of the nation\u2019s newest coal plants, approved in 2004 when many \u2014 including the panel presided over by then-Vice President Dick Cheney \u2014 thought electrical demand would continue to soar and renewables would remain costly. The Front Range coal plant went on line in 2010.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Coal was the easier answer, although natural gas had been coming on in a significant way. That Front Range coal plant went online in 2010. Holy Cross owned 1\/8th of its 750-megawatt production.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">What the former vice president\u2019s panel did not foresee in its call for many more coal plants early in the administration of George W. Bush was how rapidly the prices of renewables would tumble and the success utilities would find in integrating them without sacrificing either prices or reliability.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">A case study for this pivot is Xcel Energy. It supplies more than 60% of Colorado\u2019s electricity and is the full owner of two of the coal plants at Pueblo and primary owner of the third, Comanche 3. In 2004, the company spent millions to persuade Colorado voters they should not impose a mandatory 10% renewable portfolio standard. Too risky, too problematic, the company said. Given the mandate, the company set out to comply and found it easier than expected.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Then, in 2017, Xcel officials announced that they wanted to close the two older coal plans. That power would be replaced by renewables. This would push the utility\u2019s power generation to about 55% in Colorado.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">That was interesting. The shocker came just after Christmas 2017, when the bids were unveiled. Prices for wind had plunged to well below coal, and solar prices had dived, too. The new package will even include still-pricey battery storage, at this time set to be the largest storage outlay in the country. It was a new world in energy, and in September 2018 Colorado regulators approved Xcel\u2019s plan. By 2025 it will be at 53% renewables.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Last December, Xcel delivered another bombshell. Using existing technology, it said, it planned to be at 80% reduced greenhouse gas emissions in its power supply by 2030 as compared with 2004 levels. Furthermore, it planned to get to 100% emissions free by 2050. It just didn\u2019t know how. It believes continued technological evolution will deliver the answers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Given this backdrop, what to make of the 70% goal adopted by directors of Holy Cross Energy last year?<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Bryan Hannegan, the chief executive of Holy Cross, acknowledges that it was cautious. \u201cWe wanted to make sure that we had time to complete our goals and that we met the cost test. Remember that our Seventy70Thirty goal was premised on not increasing the cost of power supply. But we also had more access to new resources in the last year than we had expected.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">That \u201cSeventy70Thirty\u201d goal called for 70% clean and renewable energy with a 70% reduction in carbon levels as compared with 2014 levels by 2030.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">A new wind farm being developed by Nereo GC Lincoln will deliver 100 megawatts of power to the 53,000 members of Holy Cross, a co-operative, in Snowmass Village, Vail, and other communities along Interstate 70 in Western Colorado. The wind farm will be located at the east end of Xcel Energy\u2019s $1 billion, 300-turbine Rush Creek wind farm, which began operation last year. Holy Cross has rights to use Xcel transmission capacity but also owns some of that capacity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Prices of the wind power were not disclosed, but Holy Cross described them as comparable to the bids received by Xcel Energy in its 2017 solicitation. Those jaw-dropping prices, $11 to $18 per megawatt-hour for wind generation, drew national attention.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Holy Cross has ambitions to go higher with its renewable energy, including more local sources. Wind is blessedly absent in the Aspen and Vail areas, except on mountaintops. The valleys are sunny, though. Solar farms near El Jebel and at the airport at Rifle, 70 miles west of Aspen, take advantage of the abundant splash of light.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Now, Holy Cross aims for more: a 5-megawatt solar farm near the Aspen-Pitkin County Airport. It has drawn opposition from residents of Woody Creek and Brush Creek Village who object to the visual clutter of the 18,000 panels. Speaking for Aspen Skiing Co., Auden Schendler in July called for approval based on broader considerations. \u201cWe at the Aspen Skiing Co. believe our community can no longer say: \u2018We support clean energy, just not here.\u2019 Climate change is already creating impacts far beyond the visual and, if left unaddressed, will only grow worse.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Holy Cross has another reason for wanting to see local generation of electricity. Imported power has its own problems. During the Lake Christine Fire of 2018, three of the four transmission lines that deliver power to Snowmass and Aspen went down just before the Fourth of July weekend, and one of the wooden poles for the fourth line was starting to burn when firefighters arrived. If a solar farm is not the full answer, it\u2019s at least part of the solution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">With only one dissension, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the solar farm in early August. Pitkin County commissioners are scheduled to take up the proposal on Sept. 25.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Is it too soon to start talking about 80% for Holy Cross? No, and internally those discussions have started. But the pathway is not yet clear, said Jenna Weatherred, the utility\u2019s spokeswoman: \u201cI think you will see us come up with a plan to get to 80% fairly soon. We know we will get there. We just don\u2019t know exactly how we will get there.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">But can Holy Cross get to 100% emission-free energy?<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Hannegan likened his utility\u2019s quest to that of climbing a tall mountain, an apt comparison given the utility\u2019s namesake, Mount of the Holy Cross, a 14,009-foot summit near Vail. It feels pretty good to get this far, he said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">\u201cBut we know we have the rest of the summit to tackle,\u201d Hannegan said in an interview moments after a session sponsored by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission titled \u201cGetting to 100% Renewable Energy.\u201d \u201cThe hard part is the last face, the last 20%. If you\u2019re a mountaineer, that\u2019s the challenge that you live for.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">One takeaway from the PUC session, articulated by Mark Dyson of the Rocky Mountain Institute, was to not get hung up on how to achieve the last 2% to 3% of renewable energy. Better, said Dyson, to decarbonize other sectors of the economy, especially transportation and buildings.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">At a recent retreat, directors of the co-operative sized up its next steps. Staff members have what Hannegan described as \u201ctough homework assignments. They\u2019re also interesting homework assignments in the sense that they tackle some new issues that only become pressing once you have reached 70% or 80% clean energy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Holy Cross needs greater flexibility, \u201cin all shapes and sizes,\u201d including increased storage, he said. \u201cI think batteries will play a big role.\u201d Colorado\u2019s largest energy storage project, he added, is a pumped-hydro storage project near Georgetown, 45 minutes west of Denver. It can produce up to 324 megawatts of generation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Many utility managers have also mentioned the need for broadening energy markets, including creation of a regional transmission organization, something that the West lacks despite its abundance of renewable generation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">New uses of electricity in both transportation and buildings should provide flexibility to achieve emissions-free energy. Market and prices will determine just how much flexibility for Holy Cross.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Asked about what state and federal incentives will be needed to displace fuels that produce emission, Hannegan instead directed attention to the grassroots.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">\u201cI think it is up to each local jurisdiction,\u201d he said. \u201cIf it has a strong climate action plan, it will start to move away from those things that require fossil fuels. It will be up to Holy Cross to be ready and available to help those jurisdictions tamp down their emissions footprint by increasing use of emissions-free electricity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">All three counties \u2014 Pitkin, Eagle, and Garfield \u2014 and each of the individual municipalities from Aspen to Glenwood Springs have a climate action plan.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">Delivering the electricity to Holy Cross will be Guzman Energy, a relatively new wholesale supplier that got its start in 2016 by assuming deliveries to Kit Carson Electric in Taos, New Mexico. It reached an agreement for delivery swaps with Holy Cross in December that made the 70% goal attainable.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Body_Serif\">The bottom line here is that the electrical supplies for Aspen and the Roaring Fork are rapidly being cleansed of greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation has started to come on rapidly. The much tougher nut to crack will be buildings. That, however, is another and even longer story.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Special Sections-ATW-ATW_Shirttail\">Allen Best did climb Mount of the Holy Cross four times but failed in four attempts of Capitol Peak. He writes about energy, water and other topics from a base in metropolitan Denver. He can be found at <a id=\"N0x13550c0N0x1499750:N0x13550c0N0x139eff8\" href=\"http:\/\/mountaintownnews.net\/\">mountaintownnews.net<\/a>. This is adapted from a story originally published by <a id=\"N0x13550c0N0x14997b0:N0x13550c0N0x139f088\" href=\"https:\/\/energynews.us\/2019\/08\/27\/west\/colorado-cooperative-to-hit-clean-energy-goal-a-decade-early\/\">Energy News Network<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aspentimes.com\/news\/could-holy-cross-energy-go-100-renewable\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">via:: The Aspen Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Xcel Energy&#8217;s Rush Creek wind farm.Allen Best Xcel Energy&#8217;s Rush Creek wind farm.Allen Best Xcel Energy&#8217;s Rush Creek wind farm.Allen Best Xcel Energy&#8217;s Rush Creek wind farm.Allen Best Colorado Green, the state&#8217;s first major wind farm, located south of Lamar in southeastern Colorado.Courtesy photo Colorado Green, the state&#8217;s first major wind farm, located south of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2448600","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-local-news"},"acf":[],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-06-26 15:17:34","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"KSPN The Valley&#039;s Quality Rock","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2448600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2448600"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2448600\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2448600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2448600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alwaysmountaintime.com\/kspn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2448600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}